bending over to china not for shareholders, page-15

Hi squidd.

There in is the problem with the Present Board.
Deluded I may be in your eyes.I go by my own research and what the Company tell us.If thing's have changed that much,then they need to come out and be truthful with share holders.Why one future picture from Sundance and a different picture from Hanlong.

If thing's have changed from around 2 years ago,why are they,the board and Hanlong,still saying top 5 or top 10 company?Why are Sundance Resources still saying mine life of 35 years for the DSO and Itabirite of a bit over 500Mt and 2.3Bt.Hanlong saying 10 billion tonnes plus of in ground resource,enough to last the initial 35 years and decades past that time frame.

If the board are hell bent on selling the company as it appears they are,and alluded to be doing,why have they not come out and said point blank,our intention is to sell the Company as it is too hard for this board to find Partners and Funding?

George said with all due respect,the old Board had one Company interested in Sundance.There are more out there if we go about it the right way.
George also said not so very long ago that we had only drilled the tip of the iceberg as far as tenement's size and strike areas identified at that time.
Sundance have identified quite a few other strike areas since that time,around Nabeba and the area coming over the border into The Congo Republic.

Why have Sundance not announced what happened about the TWO tenements we were to get rights/permit for in the year of 2011 and the other ONE tenement they had applied for?

Regards
Westcott.