The 'radioactive tuna' are just a scientific curiosity, not relevant to the market or ecology. The tangible quality of the fish hasn't changed.
The radioactivity of the fish is about 10 times the normal level, in that specific way. Think about it like this, you are being exposed to nuclear radiation even if you're in the middle of a pristine forest. If you were to spend 10 minutes in the pristine forest instead of one minute, you would get 10 times the dose of radiation, which would still be utterly irrelevant to everything you care about.
From a health/quality point of view, I would much rather eat the 'radioactive' wild tuna than tuna farmed around the SA coast (which like all living things are radioactive anyway).
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?