clive palmer or oil major jv?, page-13

I disagree that one EGM would resolve the mess. A fair system is to have two EGMs with a time lapse in between.

The situation now boils down to RC (Askin) vs JH (CP). There need to be one meeting to vote for RC or JH. Once this result is out, the second EGM allows the defeated side to be removed and the winning camp to be voted in.

Why? Some SH may prefer to vote for JH (CP) camp, but finding that RC won, may decide to back the directors from the winning camp to avoid cross factional fighting which would have taken us back to square one.

Sooner or later, the RC vs JH issue must be resolved. So why delay it? Please think outside the square, think outside the box, think outside any thing, but think. And then tell me what you think.