us trial., page-2

I have seen the EPA report and it is great for Virotec. They did several trials and report each in detail.

The EPA presented their findings in terms of what "did not meet South Dakota limits", but the analytes that did not meet these limits are mostly irrelevant to AMD and the needs for the Gilt Edge clean up. The EPA simply measured every conceivable analyte and reported the results, but did not distinguish between those that are relevant for Gilt Edge AMD Treatment and those that are not.

So the relevant findings for AMD treatment are a little hard to decipher in the report, but all-in-all looked good for Virotec. I think there were some methodological issues that they did not get quite right, and there are a few minor anomolies in the findings, but these have been addressed and satisfied.

It is clear from the report that the EPA are doing more work and speak about the future directions, so they must be pretty impressed with Virotec.