gillard/wilson/awu, page-20

  1. 6,746 Posts.
    why haven't the companies who were supposedly defrauded by the bogus union of those monies taken legal action for restitution?

    How did the companies handle the (now what could it be called?)cost/expense/fraud/un-repaid loan/blackmail/standover, tax wise in their books?

    Has the taxation department sought or brought judgment against anyone (the recipients) for income which was never legitimate union dues nor payments and could only be termed income, even if it was obtained illegally?

    Has the taxation department taken any interest in the tax aspect of this?

    If not why not?

    Who if anyone has ordered a "hands off" to the taxation department?

    My opinions G48
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.