2006 npv vs 2012 npv, page-7

JC, so true. They (Simple investments) would be the one to know first & have a better understanding of THOR's projects. They wouldn't have invested so much if it ain't worth it.

KC & Hektikkk, We really need to sort the discrepancy between the figures from both 2006 & 2012 DFS. It totally doesn't make sense. Something (figures used) isn't right.

At $28Million NPV --> that equates to around 3.5c/share.
It's a big drop from $88Million (NPV) from the 2006 DFS.
The recent 2012 DFS should be BETTER with most parameters IMPROVING (e.g. recovery rate up, ore throughput up, tungsten price up etc).

I am not doubting but the figures need to be clarified so that other potential investors don't compare the wrong thing & mis-understand our Molyhil asset.

Kiddo