over 100,000 ounces gold production expected. , page-17

Actually mm I want exactly the opposite. A purely personal approach comes without any facts other than those held to be true by the speaker.

I have never debated the content you have supplied just your method. To respond to me as if I had attacked the content or the premise of your message is nonsense and is completely avoiding the real topic of the debate.

In understanding the comment I am making you would be well advised to look into the fallacies associated with debate.

You first implied by your wording that an opinion you held is more generally held. This is called a False Attribution.

After I noted the fallacy in your argument you then replied about something altogether different than the topic I had raised. This is both a Red Herring and an Ignoratio Elenchi.

As to the content of your most recent question. I don't know. What's more I doubt that you or anyone esle really does either because all I've heard on here recently is unqualified bitching done in the main by people who aren't even shareholders.