get rid of them, page-146

Hmm Buddy that last post definitely was ridiculous. The forward assumptions or speculation of future metrics is based on what? Past and present patterns and statistics! What makes us assume the chinese will grow or Asia is the hub of our next growth? Current and previous trends. How do you think Somalia would go on economic growth? When we buy land to develop is it based on guess work or previous growth patterns. I am betting none of us would by land in the middle of australia hoping for land prices to jackpot. Why do you think plv selected Irvine and cockatoo. Past and present patterns. I am hoping they did not spread out a map of the world and just throw darts to pinpoint a possible IO site. To dismiss the share price and its actions are fool hardy. Why? The SP, especially in specs, is what gives an investor it's return. Even if it is not monetised it gives us a current valuation. This is the most critical component. I understand buddy that you have an issue with TA. That is fine and I am not convinced entirely either. None, be it FA or TA is fool proof. However to then justify your convictions with ridiculous statements where you make ignorant statements that contradict even the process of FA, the very process you rely on is absurd. Ask yourself why you invested in PLV? Why trust Tony? What makes you feel ss&t and timeone are unreliable? It is based on past events which made you forecast what the future could be. To make an informed decision you need the past. Have you not invested in stocks like CDU to realise that even FA is not fool proof. Then why do you expect TA to be infallible? TA provides an avenue for people to preserve their capital and another means to trade. Some trust a company others on the price. In the end for the people that bought in at 1:30 or 2:00 or the aboriginal owners at 78 cents explain to them the current valuation is at 17 cents Yet the SP will take care of itself. The SP has dropped by > 90%. I would have regardless of the outcome in the short term some board changes need to be made as performance has been poor. I don't mean further additions but replacements. I wish my boss would have the same criteria for kpi as some plv investors.