I was referring to a members' voluntary winding up, as distinct from a creditors' forced winding-up. This allows shareholders to extract some value from company asset surpluses (net physical assets per share @ 31/3/12 were $2.32; current share price is $1.24).
If management is too inflexible to adapt to the changed operating environment, should we further reward them for non-performance?
Whether we liquidate voluntarily or passively let the market do it for us, aren't these people leading investors to financial oblivion?
Time to find a team that can replace the current group to get results.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- CSR
- stark choices
stark choices
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 6 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add CSR (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non--Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non--Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online