"co-incidences"..?, page-159

A

I stand corrected and apologise accordingly.

Should have stated "blew (part of) $15 mill".

The past A - interesting how you want to sweep that under the carpet as "largely irrelevent" now.

Interesting A - it was you who brought Fortrend up in ESI/ECT's past - not I. It suits you to bring up the past to make a comparison to Fortrend and the negativity associated with a drawdown facility and then in the very next post, we should leave the past in the past and focus on now.

Classic hypocracy.

The past actually brings us all to the present.

It's unfortunate that ESI are not able to sweep away the fully undiluted 3 billion shares as well.

You do realise that those shares and options exist in the present yes? and that they were created by the actions (and inactions) of others in the PAST - yes? and also by the actions of the current management - yes?

"Wildly inaccurate statement again K" - hmmm, bit of pot calling the kettle black there A - should we revisit your $100 mill funding post that you have accurately ascertained from the recent ann???

Oh and SW - not intending to get under your skin - I'm sure I could revisit a stack of your posts and point out all the inconsistencies in them as well...if I had the inclination to do so...which I don't...all those posts are in the PAST now and that's where they should stay ;o)

Surprised A hasn't jumped all over you for bringing up the past mate ;0)

Have a great day all - I feel $4 mill coming very soon - hopefully this week.

Cheers K