In its latest patent application, 20120183955, Gradalis makes no reference to BLT or any of the Graham or Waterhouse patents. Is this a sign of where things are at with them or just them sticking to the template they have used previously?
HC won't let me post the web address so here is the portal address where you can search for Gradalis.
http://portal.uspto.gov/external/portal/!ut/p/c5/04_SB8K8xLLM9MSSzPy8xBz9CP0os3hff1NDc1NLYwN3SzcDA08PwyD_YF8zINcYKB-JW97AiCLdBgR0h4Nci992vPIGEHkDHMDRQN_PIz83VT9SP8ocpylGZvqROanpicmV-gW5oREGmQEZgY6KigBnIW_S/dl3/d3/L2dJQSEvUUt3QS9ZQnZ3LzZfTU81MTc1OTMwRzlGMDBJSDFST1NNNjMwMDE!/
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- BLT
- gradalis playing hardball or business as usual
gradalis playing hardball or business as usual
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 39 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add BLT (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
RCE
RECCE PHARMACEUTICALS LTD
James Graham, CEO
James Graham
CEO
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online