online poll, page-40

Honestly, get over the whole "BIAS" thing - it just isn't a good look. If you carry that attitude through the rest of your lives then you'll find yourself being diagnosed with one of a number of mental illnesses!

Looking at the article you're complaining about there is a synopsis of both cases, both of which occupied similar column inches.

Last week a MEL publicity stunt got a lot of coverage which prima facie supported your arguement, yet when an acknowledged expert queried that stunt the following day your whining chorus became deafening.

An informed debate requires more than one side of the arguement, but as soon as any opinion counter to yours appears your paranoia goes into overdrive. What would make you think there wasn't bias? I didn't see many complaints here when only your side was published - is that a balanced approach? Presumably in your world it is because a rebuttal saw you at your worst, ranting about biased experts etc.

Is it the "comments" section that disturbs you so much? You guys seem to be doing a job spamming that too, and yet you're constantly complaining about that section too! Again, it's simple - the reason there are so many comments which go against your perspective is that that reflectts the opinion of the wider population

I realise you would prefer that opposition to this company's activities would disappear, but that isn't going to happen. It certainly isn't going to happen because you bleat loudly about bias when there doesn't appear to be any.

Of course, that's just my opinion ...

TR