Ann: Quarterly Activities and Cash Flow Report , page-9

re: Ann: Quarterly Activities and Cash Flow R... mmartin,

you know the real meaning of ASS-U-ME? You don't know me but you assume quite a lot. To enlighten you a bit:

I'm on HC probably longer than you. I just have been silent. Also I'm a so called longterm investor and it is my money, too, which is getting burned. That gives me very well a right to ask and to be sceptical. Just because I know all presentations and have met quite some members of the Board (the old ones and the new ones) doesn't mean I'm a blind believer. Most of the phrases I see in that report I have read over the years with little changes again and again, only the product focus changed. Go back to the old reports and have a look to the published timelines. And then have a look, how much the focus on the products changed. Multiple income streams? Where are they now?

My point is: certain things have been promised and not delivered. That is a fact. Measured on this my criticism is fully correct.

I asked you for facts. You mentioned in one of your posts a member of the ARU management. Do your research. YOUR named member of the ARU management is one good start.

Since when is he on board?
How many capital risings have been nessecary since then?
How have been the success of these?
Which parts of the projekts have to be put into sleep mode because of lack of fundings (e.g. Water in Aileron?)

And if you name a member of the ARU management and want to honor him as efficient, so it might be your opinion. Mine is different and it should still be allowed to voice an opposite opinion without having to deal with stupid and classless attempts of reprimanding or trying to riducle contributors for an other opinion.

It would be a real contibution, if you could publish own thoughts, not just citations from a report, which I can read AND understand by myself, instead of cheap semantics to put down people with another opinion than yours.

With all due respect - BT1100