takeover and aquisitions , page-28

Another point I'd like to make is that I think it is very important that OZL remains focused on copper and gold. The more I think about this the more it becomes clear to me. I also think that the name of the company should be adjusted to reflect this and to show we are leaving behind the scandals of the past. Almost any company is better off sticking to it's core abilities and being really good at them, I believe that this ties in with the M&A debate on here. Also agree that M&A is often a mistake but sometimes it is very profitable particularly when the market is worried that a company as it stands is going to just stop making money for a couple of years down the track. M&A at the bottom of the cycle is far less likely to lead to a rip off particularly in this case.
Has anyone else looked into PEM's purchase of Globestar? Not saying that this is a target OZL should have pursued but forms an example of good m&a.