1. "Those of us who frequent these pages, run the risk of having our judgment seriously impaired, by the constant battering of our minds, with some of the most wierd and mindless theories of US conspiracy that I've ever come across".
I say "Those of us who DON"T frequent these pages, run the risk of having a controlled view, by the constant battering of their minds, with some of the most ignorant and mindless bullshite of corporate conspiracy that I've ever come across".
2. "It's not a wonder some read and publish this stuff because they need this distorted view of the world to feed their unreasoning hatred of the US".
I say "It's not a wonder they publish this shite because they need this distorted view of the world to feed their pockets".
3. "Perhaps some of them need to learn to read critically and with discernment".
This is very true, but I would add "but from as many sources as possible".
4. "The danger in not having discernment, is that those who imbibe this manipulative garbage, always seem to end up supporting evil and murderous regimes such as that lead by Saddam Hussein. It doen't say much for the stuff they read or for them".
I say "The danger in having a limited spoon fed prescription of information, is that those who imbibe this manipulative garbage, always seem to end up supporting deceitfully evil and murderous regimes such as that lead by George Bush. It doen't say much for the stuff they read or for their own ability to think".
5. "I'm yet to hear a well reasoned and moral case that does not depend on some significant distortion".
I am also yet to hear this from the pro-war fanatics.
