Just reading through the thread and wondering. If I was Geoff reading would this make me want to do a Q&A again? Would I waste my time meeting Shareholders for a friendly chat (non-market sensitive) and then waste more time reviewing wording and making sure that concerns outlined through this forum are addressed. Would I do all that if it meant that some people start demanding formal company announcements, and others raise the possibility of unfair information. To be honest if I was him I would never do it again. Lets just keep it simple and accept it for what it is, or we might lose it.
Then I think if I was HM. Would I invite others to come ever again and share my thoughts with the forum and then their questions with Geoff, and waste time compliping it, answering it, reviewing it, getting Geoff to review and then posting it again if it meant that Geoff's integrity is questioned, or that it meant more work for Geoff? To be honest, if I was HM and if that was the case... I would just meet up with Geoff on my own next time and find out what I need (given that Geoff can divulge) and not share with anyone. That would prevent people from asking for so much more. Again, I say let's keep it simple so it can happen again and again.
A company who has a twitter account and who tweets updates that are not market sensitive is not obliged to make public announcements to cater for non Twitter users. So I don't think Anteo needs to go public with the results of the Q&A.
Just my thoughts and sorry if I am going a little defensive, but I for one dont want to lose out on future such opportunities.
ADO Price at posting:
6.0¢ Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held
