sir in trading halt!, page-67

Tahs, can you please do me a huge favor and explain EXACTLY what logic brings you to a conclusion of run-of-the mill results???

Obviously I'd be ignoring your take on the article and reading it myself, but alas I'm on the east coast. Please confirm that the article did not state that the results would be lack-luster and that this is entirely your own spin. Very frustrating not to be able to read the text.

Assuming that the article made no such claim, even by implication, why would you deduce that just because there were site visitors that the results are ho-hum? Wouldn't the opposite conclusion be more sound?? That is, they're only concerned about a perception of inside knowledge and unfair advantage because they know the price is going to jump? No jump, no possible advantage. Anticipated jump = juicy results, surely?

Thanks in advance

Ned