throwing the baby out with the bath water!, page-15

I havent time to type much ATM, but I'll quickly reply CW (please understand I'm not having a cat fight here, I do appreciate everything you are saying.)

I have not slandered BOD, i have expressed my opinion, I have not stated it as fact, I am entitled to vent my frustrations and would dearly love to see them answered, but to date havent got that. I see the progress in the company, but not in the SP, much as Arbroth agrees with my disquiet on the MC growing via the registry & the liklihood of the continued trend, we'll likely end up as big as NCM with the same SP & zeros added to the registry figure, that of couse is not fact, it is opinion.

You have on several occasions in the past week made similar statements to the one in this post:

"I hear the communication is going to ramp up and that they do hear you."

you are making factual staterments without evidence as to actions the company may or may not take, & in this instance have despite all their promises continually failed. now I'm not going to trawl back through all your posts, but you have to my mind made similar positive statements regarding the intentions of SG without any supporting evidence. I as a holder have the right to shoot fist ask questions later, if I feel SG is stalking me, I also disagree with your sentiment that we are unable to raise on market or by other sources that can provide the same growth without selling the farm.

With all due respect CW, but I dont feel I should be shot down for asking tough questions, & management need to accomodate holders of less technical expertise, if they dont agree with that, then they should have never listed on the stock market.

There has also been some posters saying if I dont like it I should sell, It's my company, If I dont like how it's being directed I should change the personnel, not give up my asset.

now back to my armchair so I can direct someone to bring me a beer.

Respectfully (though you may disagree)
F&B :)