cudeco(cdu) trading - representations, page-11

Hi Buddy,


Thanks for the advice.

The CuDeco case is being pepared progessively.

If the Regulator does not see fit to respond to my representations, it leaves me no other option but to proceed for a judicial decision. I notice Twiggy's case goes back to 2004 and a decision there is pending.

I want rampant manipulation evident in areas of the ASX
brought under stricter Regulation. Offenders dealt with.

Look at the case of CuDeco in recent years as indicated in the latest Chapter of the "CuDeco Shareholder Research " Document:

A few examples:-

1. How can such high levels of wash trades evident not be viewed upon with suspicion?

2. What steps have been taken by ASIC to ensure that these wash trades are above board?

3. How can persistent data anomalies associated with shorting where reported data doesn't match daily trading or the register be sanctioned by authorities when it clearly doesn't add up and looks to short circuit price discovery by allowing covering off market?

4. How can high volumes of dark trades be judged as not presenting market integrity issues when clearly nothing is known about such activity?
etc etc...

Cheers,

Max