Thanks to DayTrader for that link to the Ngebel study. It's a good overview of the technical and financial aspects of the project but in not being able to reference a comprehensive technical report it falls far short of the JORC-like standard we would expect if this was a copper or gold project.
However, it wouldn't have taken much effort from PAX to turn this into an inferred resource statement under the Australian geothermal reporting code, assuming a decent technical report exists somewhere.
Yes, there seems to have been a couple of shallow temperature holes (done before 2007 and not by PAX) which produced positive results. However, my main point is still true, I think this project is still at least four or five years away from generating income for PAX.
With my background I guess I like to see good technical reporting by companies. Unfortunately I don't yet see it with PAX (or the geothermals generally in fact).
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- PAX
- ppa signing and funding deal
ppa signing and funding deal, page-18
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 139 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add PAX (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
RCE
RECCE PHARMACEUTICALS LTD
James Graham / Dr Alan Dunton, MD & CEO / Non-Executive Director
James Graham / Dr Alan Dunton
MD & CEO / Non-Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online