more to come, page-5

““To a large extent this deal is what I call the bean counter’s deal: it solves the financial tsunami that was going to descend on the company,””

That “financial tsunami” was a creation of the old board. !

That “financial tsunami” was not of shareholders making , it was of mismanagement, by certain members of the board.

That “financial tsunami” has now been alleviated by the actions that were commenced in March of this year.

The person now controlling the board and bringing in deals was a direct result of the actions that were commenced in March of this year.

For certain shareholders to say “PS: just be wary of potential destabilisers with personal vendettas against certain Board members ... they have been silenced by the good news but they could cast a dark cloud over this good weather!) “ while at the same time accepting the benefits of the hard work done by a certain group of people to ensure that the “financial tsunami” was alleviated, smacks of petulance and perversity,and immaturity.

The good news is as a result of shareholder power, something that “some” only accept when it gives them a benefit and an opportunity to attack.

CB