ombudsman scathing over coal burnoff, page-39

Incorrect, I have cited the evidence. You have to understand evidence is not just the things shareholders or famers agree on separate from one another. This is what the legal system is. They'll both have their experts who have findings contrary to one another.

However as I stated earlier the most important thing from this finding is that the site is not suitable for UCG. I'm well aware of the facts regarding false readings and the 2 year thesis that follows that. Those issues are irrelevent in terms of the enormous capital investment already outlayed in Australia.