James,
You make baseless statements and declare them to be unquestionable fact. When people who may actually have some knowledge on the subject dare to point out some of the obvious flaws in your chaotic theories you decide to insult them and add them to your list of accused conspirators. You commitment to seeking real world facts is epitomised by your habit of quoting fiction writers to support your argument.
Your response to my questions resulted in you declaring "Mate I suspect you are part of what I am writing about". Accusations like that speaks loads about the way you think and how open you are to allowing real information to invade your little conspiracy world.
Some people here know me and many have read my occasional posts in recent years and I'm pretty sure that most can tell that I'm not a real participant in the silly things you kunger up despite what you have suggested on multiple occassions. On the other hand many here would have read your foolhardy and blatently ridiculous posts in which amongst other things you repeatedly tried to scare poor old Max to go into hiding because you claimed that the people he was up against where "the most dangerous in the history of the world". LOL.
So lets put things into perspective James. Which of us is more likely to be talking complete and utter crap based on past experience? PS. This question is rhetorical so don't give my your usual answer which includes Nazis, Isreal, tin hats, dangerous people with strange eyes, Roswell, freedom of speech in South Australia, french speaking cats and all that.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?