westcott,
"The Company would get more YES votes if they come clean and tell shareholders if they are in talks with others about a Joint Venture/Sharing of Infrastructure costs, Infrastructure Funding by MOU Partners with payback through off-take agreements or the like."
Doesn't logic tell you that if there was other serious options on the table regarding JV's and sharing infrastructure costs, or funding via MOU's, the SDL board would have cut ties with Hanlong months ago? Why would the board be still in discussions with Hanlong if other, better, options were on the table? I don't understand, if there was a fantastic infrastructure JV with Core staring at GJ, GC & Co, why on Earth do you think they would still be entertaining this Hanlong episode? How does that seem at all logical to you?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- SDL
- low ball chinese bid tossed out
low ball chinese bid tossed out , page-52
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 4 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add SDL (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
I88
INFINI RESOURCES LIMITED
Charles Armstrong, CEO & Managing Director
Charles Armstrong
CEO & Managing Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online