well here we go, page-43

Hi Everyone,

Naaman, you seem to be a bit disapointed with certain things, mainly relating to data/information releases on the project.

" Why are you so concerned with TON business ie- calling BB, multiple posts on TON thread etc, if you have "no sentiment" and "no position" ?, just a question not trying to be smart.

I can understand your comments on being a cynic based on some past experiences, however, IMO you cannot expect any company to release information that they may or may not have exactly as and when you would like to see it, this is unrealistic.

So far as the site visit DD report goes, i wonder just how much information you would expect TON to have received from such a short visit (4-5 days i understand), 2 - 3 days would hve been taken up with travel and official meet and greet requirements, so lets say 2 - 2 1/2 days in the field to visit licences with a combined area of 90,000 hectares.

The Ancuabe licences are approx 120kms from Pemba, probably the most prospective of these Ancuabe licences no-5336 has no access roads, best access being through the old Ancuabe mine area, the Balama North licence is 240kms from Pemba and with ok access, the Balama South licence is 280 kms from Pemba and with very limited access (no established roads/tracks), now this visit was conducted before TON obtained and Aero mag/radiometric data so probably no target areas identified before visit and obviously no samples taken during visit as this would have been announced previously had this occurred.

IMO This report would have been commissioned on a budget, hence final report not containing lots of info, IMO anything of note contained within the report would have already been released.

ZZ is 100% correct.

You cannot compare TON DD report with the SYR Jacana report, chalk & cheese, the Jacana report IMO was made to give a basis for value re the upcoming SYR deal.

If Grafex had this type of detailed info before doing the agreement with TON, IMO TON would have needed to part with alot more cash and shares to secure the deal than what they have managed to do this for(SYR paid 60,000,000 @0.075c plus 15,000,000 options for the Jacana deal).

I can say from experience that Provincial approvals are the most difficult part of the approvals process and most often cause lengthy delays, now that TON-Grafex have these titles will follow much sooner rather than later. Provincial approval basically gives Maputo office the Green light to issue titles.

Yes, i do know the ground and have been to this part of Mozambique, i also know a number of Geologists who have worked in this part of Mozambique and have extensive on the ground experience there, a few of these geo's are actively working there at this time, one of them has plenty of experience on the Ancuabe area and also knows the SYR area well.

Processing data takes time, i am sure that TON will have Southern Geoscience working on things for them as quickly as possible, i dont believe that anything is being held back from market.

As i have said before i do expect that the data processing results will provide plenty of positives (i would not wait for this ann to get set).

I know that a lot of my comments are made from being in the fairly unique position of having in country on the ground experience so can 100% appreciate that many will not be so sure or positive as myself.

Please do your own research, IMO i can only give you the facts as i know them, i gain nothing from this.

I can simply say that i believe the TON story 101% based on my own knowledge and what other very experienced industry related people with experience in Mozambique have told me.

Just another thought, i would not be surprised if TON is already in a very advanced position re securing project funding (and i'm not referring to the Cannacord placement).

If the SP ever drops back to silly levels (sub 0.07c) i will just keep accumulating as i see nothing but very good very big things in TON's future.