agm postponed till 29th of nov , page-39

You could see these delays as a further great opportunity to buy more shares and keep topping up if you were genuinely interested in supporting and investing in ECT and were satisfied in the technology and the progress this has made and other research you could do for yourself that could confirm a lot of things. I would much prefer that the meeting is delayed and critical announcements are released before the meeting than to go to the meeting with a whole room of disgruntled and angry holders all wanting an explanation for what is going on. If most or all of what we’re waiting on is cleared up by this time then the meeting can actually be used as a time to discuss what is next for the company after that and what is coming after that and therefore this could attract more investment, interest in ECT, happy holders, etc…

The questions on HC that everyone should be asking is why the constant negativity toward ESI by Kranky & Bogs and why are you still here with ‘no stock held’ (K) for such a long time!? Amazed has made some absolutely posts over the past couple of months. Quite informative and helpful posts in comparison to some other peoples' posts...

"And what happened to Monash? Aren't they the CSI saviour?"
- Well good afternoon Kranky! =) Here we go again with this school yard bickering...

Kranky are you aren't honestly saying that Amazed (or ‘A’), keeps drawing positives from negatives and that ‘tough questions’ are glossed over and that we avoid the hard questions?? “with a bit of highlighting of certain parts of announcements”... Kranky this may surprise you but likely more than 99% of posters here are shareholders and are not directors of this company nor are future-telling-gods so none of us have [ALL] the answers to [ALL] your constant questions (most of which arent questions cause they are always the same dribble)! As opposed to ‘K’ who draws on pretty much all the negatives from every single announcement released by ESI and turns any potential or ‘little’ bit of positive or what is potentially positive into something that is negative. Lets bring up the negative at any opportunity to try and slam someone else. (well, I would say theres a hell of a lot of positive for ECT but thought I’d be ‘conservative’ and not up ramp!), Talk about pot calling the kettle black 'K'.

These hard questions that you allude to are actually not for people on this forum to confirm for you ‘K’.. You’ve told me on this forum previously on several occasions to direct these ‘hard questions’ to management and the board so why is it any different for you in regards to what you would like answered??? Posters here should not feel obligated or compelled to answer questions by another poster… especially when that poster has their disclosure as ‘no stock held’, and constantly drowns the same negative points over & over like a broken record.. supposedly an investor on the stock market and therefore not a child. I am not ready to get a bib and some baby food out to start spoon feeding you answers to the same questions that are laboured every day on the ESI forum and some of which we don't even have the answers to ourselves! (Unless anyone else here can see into the future?)

How many companies are listed on the ASX 'K'?