"Quite obviously you are utterly naive in law. There is not one shred of proof that Gillard ever saw the document or even touched it - just the same as Howard - and unfortunately with no proof Gillard read/saw the document these people can get away with telling lies. Different party same defence."
What document? You're on the wrong horse. I have never mentioned anything about documents or who knew or did not know, neither do I care. Mmartin asked me to pose a specific question for Julia Gillard, which I did. But there was no response to that.
Yes, I am pretty naieve in a lot of things. But you never know, do you?
