xjo weekend zoomba lounge, page-69

Hey R2R, no I understood exactly where you were coming from, it was just not a path that was going to give me any satisfaction.

Fibonacci relates to psychology which I would suggest astrology does also however not in the same way. If it did then I would not have needed to ask the question.

Fib leaves very specific foot prints and there are specific templates the numbers follow. As I've said previously on fibonacci, everything is connected. If someone were to ask me the same question I asked only specific to Fib, the answer would require a novel to do so but the answer is available.

The point I tried to make in my reply to you is that when I take that knowledge and apply it to astro cycles, it doesn't fit. However I would expect that for someone to have a true understanding of Astro, that they would be able to provide the why.

Elliott has the why
Gann to a far lessor extent has the why

If you know the why, then you can also work out the 'why not'.

FWIW every bit of analysis I do, I mean absolutely everything, starts at volume.