why cdu has to be a lt investment, page-35

james,

you don't need any help with your FUD from me.

I'll make my last post a bit simpler just for you, even though it was addressed to someone else.

from my perspective, after careful reading of all of their resource statements and supporting documentation:

the co didn't like the most robust estimation technique they have used, which was behind their second one.
so they have, imo,(either knowingly or unknowingly) taken advantage of the properties of another technique and modified the inputs to that algorithm to create a less robust estimate which sounds much better.
on top of this, they have speculated that it is an underestimate, which is easy to do when you have as many disciples as cdu appear to have, with a tendency to hear only what they want to hear.

In time, I'm very confident that you will discover that cdu are their own worst enemy.
Actually it would really be RE-discover, at least for some.

the asx and asic have bugger all to do with any of this.