On one hand you put the Monash delay of funds to ESI as a strategic ploy to look desperate and beggared (my words) so that ESI will be needy enough to recieve ALDP funding.
Now you are using the opposite arguement for Exergen stating that with their backers they should have all just put in the $100 mill already.
Both ECT and Exergen will be applying/have applied for ALDP funding.
Why then do you see fit to make one claim to support delay of funds for ESI and then not the same should apply for Exergen?
If ESI's tactic is so strategic, would not a company applying the same tactic not be seen as strategic also?
What's good for the goose is good for the gander - yes?
By the way, Exergen is an unlisted private entity, they do not need to publicly ann anything. If anything the ALDP guidelines have actually requested for Co's not to release shortlisting unless necessary as per ASX disclosure rules. These rule do not apply to Exergen.
Cheers K
ESI Price at posting:
1.3¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Not Held
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)