LH: "While I struggle to live and breathe on my own limited capacity to collate and analyse data"
Well, you've made that abundantly evident on a few forums on this website LH. Why not do something more constructive with your time to live and breathe more easily? Also, is it just me, or do others think, aside from your whacky pseudo-science and biased take on everything, your signature doesn't do much to enhance your credibility?
In this case Greenhart has properly highlighted the nature of the link between electricity generation and emissions.
Yet you write: "It is time consuming vetting articles for accuracy" How ironic is that? Mostly your moronic "trader's rants" go uncorrected for their large quantity of BS. Yet occasionally someone bothers to draw the line. Why not acknowledge and be grateful for the time people take to provide that reality to you, rather than continually inserting your cranium where the sun doesn't shine?
And then we get this gem:
"Accurate raw data tells its own story, and you have to be able to trust it implicitly IMO.."
But you don't - as you admit, you "struggle to.. analyse data" and then go on to make up your own waffle. I don't understand the point of it all.
