911. what's your take on it?, page-130

  1. 1,378 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 12
    Ok tinnitus and others,

    Firstly, a B25 bomber crashed into the north side of the empire state building in 1945 causing minimal damage. Due to this and another incidence of a light aircraft also demolishing itself on the ESB the designers of the WTC buildings did in fact take into account large passenger aircraft impact into their design. If you had toured the twin towers you would have been told this.

    Secondly, the USA phone systems in 2001 mostly consisted of CDMA and GSM networks, there was much more distance between towers and large fade-out and black-out areas. The phones used would have needed to have been close to a tower to get clear reception through the aircraft's aluminium frame and fuselage which wiring systems are also statically earthed making reception at distance even more difficult.

    I, like most people that do not swallow on 911 have American friends and find (most) American people both friendly and a pleasure to know. Like myself, most Americans do not swallow on 911 either.

    Why for some of you is it so difficult to accept that not all of the official story stacks up?
  2. This thread is closed.

    You may not reply to this discussion at this time.

 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.