Sorry DM I don't agree with your perception.
I don't accept or agree with your claims that Haliburton were the ones to suddenly make things efficient or to in some way upgrade the management in either technique or timeliness.
In my opinion the sell off was because the flow rates were not as exciting as hoped .... what the reason is for the non performance of the flow rates is the important issue.
That is why more information is critical.
The collection of that information may not fit with your trading schedule but unfortunately "thems the breaks".
If it is as was posted earlier by ???? (my appologies to that poster for not remembering) that it is a result of the water swelling the clay particles that is restricting the flow then maybe there is an engineering solution to this problem.
The early flow back rates were exciting and gave the potential for an unexpected windfall income.
How the company goes forward to interpret this data and the potential resource will be in consultation with their joint venture partners .... it will be by agreement what happens next so any amount of whining and whinging, that they are not meeting posters wishes here are not realistic, helpful or infact relevant to the next steps.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?