re: Ann: Framework Agreement re Acquisition o...
Hi mits and all. Had nothing better to do than go through September 2011 activity report and original ercospan report. There was mention of 8 holes that were recommended to be drilled on chelk ar site to confirm historical drilling and then if favourable further larger holes over larger area to define site and get samples for Jorc purposes. Surely if that has occurred which I would have expected since the initial report ercospan in mid 2011 does anyone know if anything would stop them reporting the results from these 8 holes that we assume has led to the further drilling? I know Marcos etc indicate investigation is ongoing etc but further investigation as I read it was dependant on favourable results from the 8 minor drill holes that were to total 4300 metres roughly. Maybe a release of this info if it has in fact occurred would make myself and others more sure of ongoing investigations on sites ???? Would love some news of exactly what has occurred there in detail over last year and a half if anything???
KPC Price at posting:
$1.00 Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held