re: big fear
I personally think US have the pieces you can logically place together to come to the conclusions they have made, but I don't believe they have the hard in-your-face facts that would conclude once and for all that Iraq are still engaged in production of weapons of mass production. So would it be of any use to publish material that would simply not be accepted or portrayed as fabricated. Last night's announcement that Iraq have threatened to kill any scientist who provides information to the security council is a perfect example. I'm not saying its true or false but how would proof be presented? Email, letter, recorded tape? All that would happen is a counter claim that the proof has been fabricated, and this has happened before.
In the end it all comes down to your personal beliefs, as no amount of evidence is going to prove either way. Personally I believe Saddam is a man who cannot be trusted, and I do not think he has the world's best interests at the top of the agenda. He's a cagey one, and nothing short of going into exile would convince me that something should not be done.
