as i stated hoots, that came up in the aftermath of the AGM and im quite certain its been resolved between the parties..
in any case what does a dispute between WEG and SS&T got to do with 'a change in the company's cockatoo island project' when neither party owns any of the project? it would be over the 20% of shares in PLV that WEG own, but again i'm certain that's over and done with and none of PLV's business.
if WEG was challenging their 50% and removal of it, why would that be a TH? how does a 'potential challenge' = a change in the companys cockatoo island project? (just thinking out a loud here folks..)
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- PLV
- trading halt changes at cockatoo ?
trading halt changes at cockatoo ?, page-26
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 150 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add PLV (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
SER
STRATEGIC ENERGY RESOURCES LIMITED
David DeTata, Managing Director
David DeTata
Managing Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online