Muller's study has its critics of course... Maybe you should have a look at what they say before rushing to your decision just because fellow AGW believer Muller supports your beliefs and AGW dogma...
Maybe you can give me a reference to the part of Muller's study where there is something more than this massive leap of faith from AGW believer Muller to claim that human activities are the principal driving force of any temperature changes...
It seems that the deluded finger is pointing in the wrong direction, but that is not unusual it seems...
Incidentally ,please quote the post where I quote a "shock jock" as my source...
It is good to see that we seem to agree on the basic facts: 1/ the climate has always changed 2/ the climate will always change 3/ the climate is always changing
It does seem to be a somwhat low signal to high noise problem (you can look this up if you dont understand it) of very small temperature changes, with significant same order of magnitude "corrections" input by the processor, within a relatively massive dynamic range of daily,monthly, yearly, decade tempertaure changes with of course a changing set of instumentation, instrumentation location, and other changing environmental effects...
And of course, it is expected that in this constantly changing complex, chaotic climate system that temperature changes will be natural and expected, in fact the lack of measured temperature changes would be unnatural and of course the time scale of any study relative to the time scale of natural cycles of change can be very important...
