the 'ss' global warming propaganda & lie machi, page-51

Do or not do. There is no threaten.

"Skepticalscience.org" does exist as what appears to be a time wasting site for users lost on their way to SkepticalScience.com

I will still need an actual link if hanrahan wants me to answer his question. However I would point out that the overwhelming proportion of climate scientists supporting AGW is actually not one of the ten points in my earlier post.

denmor addressed one of the ten points. The graphs he presented do show accelerating sea level rise. Effectively his post demonstrates support for point six.

berretta appears to be trying to suggest that climate changes so slowly that trends need at least hundreds of years to show up clearly. I respectfully suggests berretta takes another look at the escalator graph. The longer term (20+ years) shows an upward trend but "skeptics" appear to have focussed on much shorter time scales.

Berretta, if 20+ years is too short, what about these very brief (<5 years) periods of temperature decline that the "skeptics" have identified?