I'm a defrocked Knight of the Southern Cross a Roman Catholic Sect!!!
so I'll try and unravel your post for you.
The developers "sued" to change the zoning of what was ALSO Flood Land. When successful any Buyer from the Developer by Local Gov't searches would have known it was flood prone land. I imagine even the Real Estate Salesman used the Wivenhoe Dam as mitigating circumstances re 1974 Flood Data.
Do you follow GFC? Rezoning was denied not ONLY on Flood Plain grounds.By Appealing the Developers got rezoning of previous vacant flood prone land and this rezoning was aided and abetted by Independent Studies proposing the Wivenhoe Effect on 1974 Flood Levels.
Are you getting some depth of understanding of the issue now,WhatGFC? or do ya continue with your ratbag rant about saving the future with your shouted Truth!!
go wash your sack cloth and ashes in a flood.
I live in Bundaberg now. High and Dry but within spitting distance of the flood[less than 100 yards from my door]
maybe you should come to Bundaberg for an audience of victims to whip up and inspire to your 'wholesome' solutions?
Tell 'em it's not an Act of God but the One World Gov't of Mammon screwing the downtrodden yet again.
