self fullfilling phrophecy, page-6

You are still doing the same thing.

"You are still trying to cover the very important background gas issue instead of anlysing it and they trying to direct people's attnetion to cost of drilling, etc.." as I said above.

This is another very good indication for me that we NSE will hit hydrocarbons as you have good contacts (this was your claim before as it was proven on delayed rig issue on June 2012) and you know something we don't know.

Tell me your thoughts about background gas issue please..! Don't try to stay away from it. Let's discuss about it if you would like to do so.

In the past posts you and Bhutos were talking about the anticline under the Gibb maitland Location (as well as I was even talking about it before you guys).

You said "I reviewed them in the past I especially liked the one call Gibb Maitland as it is covered by 3 if not 4 seismic lines of good quality. So roll on drilling."

Here is your posts;

Post by Bhutos; Post #: 8159133, 31 May 2012
--------------------------------------------------------
Hi Slamp, actually I looked again based on the new more specific locations released (rather than the large ovals they had previously that i'd used last time I looked into it) and it looks like Nicolay isn't on that large anticline to the far left of Sally May which is a shame because it was huge but yeah, Gibb Maitland is on one.

It might be out a bit given it juggled 3 overlapping maps and it's based on an MT survey:

Post by SLAMPOIL ; Post #: 8160296, 31 May 2012
--------------------------------------------------------
Hi Bhutos

Those prospect leads I believe were defined by aeromagnetic data and seismic control if available.

When I reviewed them in the past I especially liked the one call Gibb Maitland as it is covered by 3 if not 4 seismic lines of good quality.

So roll on drilling.

The biggest risk in a conventional sense is that there is no known producible reservoir. Sally May 1 and 2 well had nothing but tight rocks sub-salt.

As an aside the work done on the core of Sally May 2 over the Goldwyer fm indicates no (none) source rock potential, hopefully this was due to the Sally May area being slightly high and the organic material not being preserved.

We shall know in a few months
----------------------------------------------------------

Now we can see that there is the background gas from 2900m level even in the salt but very close to Bongabinni and Nita!

Any thoughs?

Please don't change the direction again.