recent pdy updates from management, page-311

Sorry Plonko I replied when I got back on here unlike you I have a life.

In regards to the spike in admin fees I would think it has something to do with payments etc for the Merger, GM, etc etc, if you wish to have a please explain you are entitled to a break down, just ask.

"There isn't going to be any exploration or evaluation, any time soon.
They're conserving cash, remember!"

Um why do you think I said I would like that explained!

You stated:
"A 46% spike in SP (of any company) will more often than not, see a query from the ASX."

and hence I stated we will then probably see a please explain from the ASX soon if that is the case?????????? WTF

"Nearly everything you post is incorrect, and the one that parley caught you out on, has taken you 20 hours to find a way to try to worm your way out of.
Had me confused as to what SEC was, but discounted it as another of your made up acronyms, such as INF."

What did Parley catch me out on nothing, if I use a direct quote then it is not right to change things in it such as SEC, but the definition is identical to Oz one. Why is everything I say incorrect:

* I didn’t say the SP would move due to the Merger you did, I said it wouldn’t
* I didn’t say the Upgrades to resources would make the SP move you did, I said it wouldn’t
* You said that PDY did not submit the paper work for Merger….Wrong
* You stated no one replied to your Director disclosure question….I did twice
Etc
Etc
Etc
I have an opinion sometimes it is right and sometimes it is wrong, but as I have stated a number of times when I am wrong I apo0logise and learn from it…..do you??????

Even my post regarding cross trades, the laws are the same US or Oz, but I specifically posted that one because it was a definition explaining why I thought cross trading was interesting. It was from Investopedia you know (Educating the world about Finance), I actually read financial information from around the globe in order to be informed of what may or may not affect my investments and sometimes I find interesting things outside of Australia, funny that. But Plonko if you wish to wear blinkers and never learn anything then that is your choice not mine.

My opinion is my own and what I believe is major differs from what you believe is major. I look at the big picture in regards to what might make a success of a speccie I have invested in, the INF and Chinese. The thing is also my future and success does not in anyway rely on how PDY goes. It is truly either a good investment or a deduction nothing more.

One very important thing you need to understand is that I have no emotional attachment to any of my investments. I am here because the Chinese are still here, risk reward is good and I believe that if things work out with INF and the Chinese then it doesn’t matter if the mgmt team is good or bad the stock will fly.

I never wanted TQ but s$%t happens and we are stuck with him.

I will make a deal with you and I reckon 401 will join in aswell, if you build up close to 5% we will support you in regards to TQ, OK?