shorters bluffing - green finish, page-89

sounds like a page from the book of relevations.

If you were having a net sesh and, by rare chance, Clarkey came over and gave you a few tips would you patronise him if he used terms you weren't familiar with?
If you were having a cooking class would you patronise the chef if he/she used terms you weren't familiar with?

See where I'm coming from?

Mitta has a system that works. He makes a living from this system, just as sportsmen, chefs and other processionals alike do the same.

Someone is trying to help you here PU. If you can't show mitta the respect he deserves for sharing his analysis then perhaps you are better off just ignoring his posts altogether. You seem to be so wound up in your vendetta against anything TA that you have lost all form of maturity along the way.

Time and time again it has been shown that charting is effective; not perfect, sure, but its a damn lot more effective than the hold and hope strategy that you seem to be fixated on!

You also seem to have this notion that you need scientific proof in order to believe in something; can you show me where is the research that validates your approach to investing in LYC (also known as holding and hoping)? Holding and hoping has, since 2008, been a lost cause strategy for 95% of the stock market.