Ann: Quarterly Activities Report , page-17

I also try to find positive things but since I´m a holder I have to be even more critical, anyhow here some comments to your last posting:
1.) debts: If that´s really the case Potosi/Silver Peak has to be really very profitable to get the money back in a reasonable period,
2+3.) If you check the average prices they stated in Q3 report + changes compared to previous quaters and Q4 => Perilya gets a very little premium (~2%) for the hedging compared to what the received in average for Q4.
5.) Only agree if the increase in debts does not come from Potosi. Otherwise it is the opposite: spent a fortune for developing Potosi...
6.) majority chinese, well I´m not sure if that is an advantage...
7.+8.) I dont see a takeover + I´d prefer to keep the money in the company instead of paying a dividend

Perilya earned 5.4 MAUD in the first 6 months (after tax) including a negative sales adjustment of 6.3 MAUD. Prices increased in the second half year + no negative sales adjustment => >15Mio AUD, correc`t? did I forget something?