darryle, your quite entitled to select whoever you want as the worse PM in history.
As noted in my previous posts others have made different selections as the worse PM.
As no criteria has been set for how the worse PM is selected, it is difficult to be objective about the selection, and will come down to what issues and events are important to each individual.
Whitlam would have strengths and weaknesses, successes and failures just like any other PM. (lifes not black and white.)
So how would you measure the worse PM?
By opinion? By policies? By popularity? By KPI's? By social achievements? By economic achievements? By legislation? By reforms? By vote? By performance? By other?
