Here mate:
This is the successful Gloucester hostile takeover.
http://www.thisisnoble.com/index.php?option%3Dcom_content%26task%3Dview%26id%3D979%26Itemid%3D85&device=desktop
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/noble-approaches-takeover-with-a-double-edged-sword/story-e6frg8zx-1225874721737
Obviously alot has happened since and Gloucester subsequently merged to for Yancoal.
For a failed hostile Arrium bid:
http://www.theage.com.au/business/world-business/noble-puts-failed-arrium-bid-behind-it-20121109-291pp.html
And this one is MOST relevent to KAB:
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/archive/business-old/noble-group-trumps-exxaro-with-132m-bid-for-territory-resources/story-fn4xq4cj-1226072240825
Not that it started with debt funding similar to KAB, then became debt for equity swap, followed by the take over. Sound familiar?
But to be honest I think your focus on take over is premature. And why the focus on hostile? Surely Noble is friendly?
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?