So you're substantiation is still only you're view it's not backed with fact..
'- Firstly, how one earth would you know such details, unless you have an affiliation with P1.'
- one Earth lol ok.. Bud you don't have to be affiliated to have an understanding and knowledge of what they're had to go through..
'Secondly, You try and suggest the company did what it had to simply to enable ASIC to understand it. I don't buy that for one second.'
- couldn't care less I'm not trying to sell it to you... However if P1 did put everything they had into the prospectus it would have been nearly one thousand pages.
'The reality is, which it seems plainly obvious now that you clearly have no idea off, the amendments that P1 inevitably had to make to the prospectus at the request of ASIC was as such because it not only would not have conformed to the requirements set out by ASIC but possibly even been ineligible to being with.'
- there you go you're starting to get it..
'Yeah I have been reading these threads for many months now.
Non holders are capable of reading back from certain dates FYI.'
- really, I wasn't aware of that..
'and yes I am forgetting, please remind me, where are these 'potential funds' supposedly coming from?'
- wow another downramper that wants to be spoon fed. You now know how to go back through the threads you work it out.. It shouldn't be too hard with someone of your interlec.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?