Ann: Interim Financial Report for the half-year e, page-86

re: Ann: Interim Financial Report for the hal... "Chuks perfect example of that is andean resources.
His fundamentals told him to sell yet the market disagreed with him and he admits to big losses because of it."

Seriously Vendor, do you ever get anything that I say?
I really feel like I am wasting my time.

I didn't sell for fundamental reasons. I posted that my fundamentals told me the asset was worth closer to $1. I sold earlier mainly because I made the mistake of taking on board what was told to me re high risk in Argentina which turned out to be incorrect, and I also wanted to use the cash to trade. Fundamentals told me to wait for $1 at that time.
Also I sold Andean at a profit in the 30's after buying at 9c. I've posted that enough times.
Where did you get “big losses” from?
I also said over the next few years I made just as much from trading as I would have made on Andean right up until the GFC.

You almost always twist anything I say, and this time you not only twist it but you say the opposite.

As for my comment on not holding stocks from $1 to $10 and back to $1, why do you bother with comments like;

"Once again chuk. it was not in reference to you but in reference to trendtrackers story."
I know what it was in reference to so why imply I didn't?
You said, referring to long term investors, "Stocks that have gone from 2 to 12 and back to 2 or from 10 to $1.00 then back to 10 again with the 'long term investors' still sitting on them." and I replied that we don't all behave that way.
I am a long term investor as well so what's your problem with my reply?
And do you regularly misquote what I post as in the Andean example above?
Do you simply enjoy getting on peoples nerves or just enjoy wasting everyone’s time with pointless replies?
Or do you really just not get anything that I post?