cashman2284, tas74t,
You're misconstruing what I've said.
I never suggested that it's substantiated that they, P1, will fail in raising the full capital stated. What I said was, that is a view I hold which is not merely a 'downramp' but a justified view.
Hence, what's substantiated is that I was not simply 'downramping'. Hope this clears that up for you...
tas74t,
A prospectus could be one million pages long..it makes no difference if it's completely distorted and or improper.
Finally, as for;
"...wow another downramper that wants to be spoon fed. You now know how to go back through the threads you work it out.. It shouldn't be too hard with someone of your interlec."
May I ask firstly, what's an 'interlec'? I presume you mean 'intellect'. For such a stickler for spelling, it's funny how many errors you abundantly make.
Additionally, it was YOU that put the question to me. How can I be a 'downramper' if I'm merely asking for the answer to the question that you asked.
Doesn't make much sense now, does it?
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?