This is the email I sent to Sam Willis at 3.46pm today.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Sam
I couldn’t receive any reply from you regarding to my questions yet. I am only after the information which had to be released to shareholders as in industry standards but nothing else.
I have now received the SEISMIC SECTION of main seismic line (84GL-01) and the secondary seismic line (84GL-02) which I believe GB-1 is located on from a confidential source. I have been informed that they are not confidential.
This seismic was made by Sydney Oil and Gas in Nov 1984, seismic lines 84-GL01, 84-GL04 and 84-GL06. Seismic data was reprocessed by AMOCO in 1989.
I can see huge anticline and structures in the area which could be the conventional targets.
Can you please see the attached files and inform me if I am at the right direction and release the related data and interpretation to the market?
As you know two of my questions were about;
1) Type of structures which are expected to be intersected like conventional reservoir targets if there is any just above the primary target Goldwyer shale formation!
2- Interpretation of NSE or COP teams about the seismic section.
I am holding my intention to make the complain to ASX for now as I want to give you some more time to take the correct actions about these disclosure issues. I will do it on Monday if I still can’t get any response.
Regards
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- NSE
- wet gas encountered at depth in lower section!
wet gas encountered at depth in lower section!, page-25
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 68 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
KAI
Pilbara Minerals buys land off Kairos part of its York gold project for $20M – and a 2% royalty on any PLS gold sales
MND
Albemarle lithium downsize burns $200M hole in Monadelphous's pocket as latter's contracts terminated