Hi Yak,
I heard the same rumours also and before we all split our wrists it really doesn't make a rats @rse of difference what cosmetic actions the UK partnership asks to be made re ASX announcements - because they still need the IP.
If the 'coalition of developers ' is going to ditch the whole project because some contractual details were released to early then it probably wasn't much of a project to start with was it, LOL. (1)
And if they are going to rebuild the whole project to exclude BQT for the same reason then its probably not worth taking Monoco seriously either.(2)
If they are going to try and keep the IP and exclude BQT then the project will sink into a legal morass before it even starts.(3)
So which of the three do you think they will follow.
I don't think any of the above. The Rhiando's have got more than enough on their hands just trying to capitalise the project and are clearly very p!ssed off by announcemnets being made by Genner too early - a situation that has been compounded by some of the morons on this website who for small personal gain prospects have sought to intrude into a corporate projects private workings.
If people with exposure on here who made phone calls to a business partner of BQT in the UK want to know who has probably inflamed this whole situation they should go and look at themselves in a mirror.
They are all first class f%ckwits who have clearly never worked in a business environment before.
Meanwhile BQT's core business moves forward - if they (the same people mentioned in the last paragraph) would be so kind as to not try to fluck those up also by pretending they have some right to intrude.
Cheers,
BQT
bqt solutions limited
